The case against chemical abortion: destroy a young human being, poses risks to the mother’s health, too. 

By Paul Stark, Communications Director, Minnesota Citizens for Life

Chemical abortions are on the rise. They provide a convenient way for the abortion industry to extend its reach—and are quickly becoming the most common method of abortion.

These drug-induced abortions (called “medication abortions” by supporters) haven’t typically generated the same level of opposition as abortions later in pregnancy or those that use viscerally brutal methods like dismemberment.

But they should. Chemical abortions threaten to produce—indeed, have already produced—a large-scale destruction of children and a range of dangers to their mothers.

Here’s the case against them.

Read the rest of the article here. Article from National Right to Life News Today.